Legal Opinion

Hoopa Valley Tribe v. United States Bureau of Reclamation

District Court, E.D. California

Decided February 8, 2023No. 1:20-cv-01814Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 HOOPA VALLEY TRIBE, Case No.: 1:20-cv-01814-JLT-EPG 12 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION 13 v. (Doc. 108) 14 UNITED STATES BUREAU OF RELCAMATION, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 18 I. INTRODUCTION 19 This lawsuit concerns management of the Trinity River Division (“TRD”) of the federal 20 Central Valley Project (“CVP”). In the operative second amended complaint (“SAC”), the Hoopa 21 Valley Tribe (“Plaintiff” or “Hoopa”) advances several categories of claims. (See Doc. [142].) At 22 the…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
  2. Lujan v. National Wildlife FederationSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. Bennett v. SpearSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  4. Alliance for Wild Rockies v. CottrellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  5. Norton v. Southern Utah Wilderness AllianceSupreme Court of the United States · 2004

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API