Legal Opinion

Pressley v. Continental Can Co., Inc.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided January 16, 1979No. 7821SC224PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ERWIN, Judge.

Defendants argue that plaintiff’s action is barred by the statute of limitations. A libel action must be brought within one year, G.S. 1-54(3), of the date it accrues, which is the date of publication. Gordon v. Fredle, 206 N.C. 734, 175 S.E. 126 (1934); Price v. Penney Co., 26 N.C. App. 249, 216 S.E. 2d 154 (1975), cert. denied, 288 N.C. 243, 217 S.E. 2d 666 (1975). Here, the statute of limitations is a bar to any action on the original making of the report, which occurred in 1972. However, plaintiff contends that there was continuous publication of the report between October…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Stewart v. Nation-Wide Check CorporationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  2. RH Bouligny, Inc. v. United Steelworkers of Amer.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  3. Alpar v. WEYERHAEUSER COMPANY, INC.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974
  4. Robinson v. Nationwide Insurance CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  5. Gordon v. . FredleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Troxler v. Charter Mandala Center, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988
  2. Beverly A. Cluff-Landry v. Roman Catholic Bishop of ManchesterSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2017
  3. Kwan-Sa You v. RoeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990
  4. Friel v. Angell Care Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994
  5. Friel v. Angell Care Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API