Hendrix v. Page
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
ON PETITION FOR REHEARING
NAJAM, Judge.
We deny the Pages’ petition for rehearing but once again address the fundamental issue in this case. The Pages contend that their personal injury action against Hendrix in the Scott Circuit Court, filed while the automatic bankruptcy stay was in effect, did not violate the stay. The Pages argue that this court invaded the bankruptcy court’s jurisdiction when we “found” in our first opinion that their action violated the stay and held that their complaint was void ab initio. See Appellee’s Petition for Rehearing at 4; Hendrix v. Page (1993), Ind.App., 622…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited14 opinions
- In Re: Russell Schwartz Linda Schwartz, Debtors. Russell Schwartz Linda Schwartz v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Pettibone Corporation v. Carl EasleyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
- Maritime Electric Co. v. United Jersey BankCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
- In the Matter of Gladys E. Shondel, Debtor-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
- Easley v. Pettibone Michigan Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Stevens v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2002
- Hammes v. BrumleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1995
- E.P. v. Marion County Office of Family & ChildrenIndiana Court of Appeals · 1995
- Shewmaker v. EtterIndiana Court of Appeals · 1994
- Otte v. OtteIndiana Court of Appeals · 1995
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.