Legal Opinion

Greenwald v. Emex Realty Co.

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided December 14, 1939PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

Order unanimously reversed on the law, with ten dollars costs to defendants, and motion denied. The motion was to vacate a stipulation of settlement and discontinuance. All the papers show that plaintiff’s attorney prepared the release which he signed and that such release and the check to plaintiff were delivered after agreement for settlement and discontinuance had been arrived at. No judgment was necessary nor agreed upon to effectuate the settlement. The action was at an end.

The defendants deny there was any fraudulent representations which induced the settlement. Under such circumstances…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Yonkers Fur Dressing Co. v. Royal InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
  2. Sperb v. Metropolitan Elevated Railway Co.New York Supreme Court · 1890

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Balbert v. BalbertNew York Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Ressler v. DruckNew York Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Schlossberg v. SchlossbergNew York City Family Court · 1970
  4. Antenna Systems Corp. v. Entron Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Chase Manhattan Bank v. Porter Flushing Realty, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1963

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API