Legal Opinion
State Ex Rel. Ohio Adult Parole Authority v. Coniglio
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided January 11, 1993No. 92AP040028PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Gwin, Presiding Judge.
Appellee Vincent Coniglio is a probationer from a sentence of incarceration imposed following his conviction of a crime in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. Apparently in 1991, appellee was accepted for supervision in Ohio under the Interstate Compact for the Supervision of Parolees and Probationers, pursuant to R.C. 5149.17. On February 11, 1992, appellee was taken into custody by the Ohio Adult Parole Authority in Tuscarawas County pursuant to a “Hold/Detainer” filed by the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, with the Tuscarawas County Sheriffs Department, on the allegation…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Sosna v. IowaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Southern Pacific Terminal Co. v. Interstate Commerce CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- County of Los Angeles v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Weinstein v. BradfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- State v. HillSupreme Court of Iowa · 1983
3Cited by3 opinions
- Hubble v. Bi-State Development AgencyIllinois Supreme Court · 2010
- Hubble v. Bi-State Development Agency of the Illinois-Missouri Metropolitan DistrictIllinois Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. Haines, Unpublished Decision (8-14-2002)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2002