McKinley v. Broom
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Appeal from Benton Circuit Court; /. N Maples, Judge; There was no error in the instructions given; but they are not before this court for review. It is not sufficient to incorporate the instructions in the motion for new trial, and there allege that certain of them were given and others refused.
Read the full summary
Appeal from Benton Circuit Court; /. N Maples, Judge; There was no error in the instructions given; but they are not before this court for review. It is not sufficient to incorporate the instructions in the motion for new trial, and there allege that certain of them were given and others refused. The instructions must be brought into the bill of exceptions proper, as also the exceptions thereto. 88 Ark. 350; Id. 505; 60 Ark. 250; 86 Ark. 486; 85 Ark. 488; Id. 326; 87 Ark. 50; 76 Ark. 177.
1Opinion of the Court
Hart, J. P.
McKinley brought this suit in attachment before a justice of the peace in Benton County, against L,. Broom. The attachment was sustained, and judgment was rendered in favor of McKinley against Broom for $143.34. Broom appealed to the circuit court, where, in a trial before a jury, a verdict was- returned in his favor, and McKinley has appealed to this court from the judgment rendered.
Counsel for appellant assign as error the action of the court in instructing the jury, but we can not consider the instructions. What purports to be the instructions given by the court are in the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Meisenheimer v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1904
- Werner v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1884
- O'Neal v. ParkerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1907
- Seifrath v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1880
3Cited by8 opinions
- Walker v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1919
- Powell v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1960
- Yarbrough v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1944
- Hicks v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1956
- Ward v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1918
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.