Legal Opinion · Dissent

Brown Real Estate Co. v. Lancaster County

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided May 6, 1922No. 22212Published

1DissentDean, J.

The language of section 1, ch. 215, Laws 1919, seems to be plain in its requirements when considered in connection with the entire scope of paving legislation. Section 1 reads:

“Wherever any paving district is created along or adjacent to any state institution or the state fair ground, the officers having in charge state institutions, or the fair grounds, are hereby authorized and empowered to sign petitions in the name of the state, to create paving districts.”

It is said in the opinion of the majority that to interpret the .act according to the plain meaning of its words is to impute to the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Hurford v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1876
  2. Morse v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Morrow v. Barber Asphalt Paving Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  4. Hutchinson v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Batty v. City of HastingsNebraska Supreme Court · 1901

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API