Legal Opinion

Parsons Band Cutter & Self-Feeder Co. v. Haub

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 10, 1901No. Nos. 12,503 — (63)PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Action in the district court for Stearns county to recover $200 upon promissory notes. The case was tried before Searle, J., and a jury, which rendered a verdict in favor of defendant. From an order denying a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or for a new trial, plaintiff appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtLovely, J.

Action to recover upon two promissory notes, aggregating in amount $210, given for a Parsons band cutter and self-feeder, — an implement to be attached to a threshing machine for the purpose of cutting the bands of grain bundles delivered in the thresher. *181Defendant, by way of counterclaim, alleges that the band cutter and feeder was warranted to do good work, in feeding the threshing machine to which it should be attached as rapidly and evenly as such work could be done by hand; that there was a breach of the warranty, whereby he sustained damages to the extent of $400. The warranty and…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. J. I. Case Threshing-Machine Co. v. McKinnonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1900

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Henningsen v. Bloomfield Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1960
  2. Hercules Powder Co. v. RichCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1924
  3. Attix v. Minnesota Sandstone Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1901
  4. Fulwiler v. LawrenceCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API