United States v. Dutil
U.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review
1Opinion of the Court
KERCHEVAL, Judge:
Appellant was convicted at a general court-martial bench trial for the attempted possession of methaqualone, a violation of Article 80, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 880. The court sentenced appellant to confinement at hard labor for 23 months, forfeiture of all pay and allowances for 23 months, reduction to pay grade E-l, and a dishonorable discharge. The convening authority approved the sentence as adjudged. Appellant now submits four *709asserted errors for our consideration. The first of these concerns the jurisdiction of the court-martial.
Appellant was…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- United States v. TrottierUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1980
- United States v. UsryU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1980
- United States v. RogersUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1979
3Cited by2 opinions
- Commonwealth v. ArcelaySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
- United States v. MidkiffU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1983