Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

People v. Bhasin

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 6, 2009No. E046137PublishedCited by 4 opinions

[CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION*]

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

RICHLI, J.

Defendant Sunil Kumar Bhasin was set to stand trial on a fraudulent loan transaction and identity theft in Riverside County Superior Court (.People v. Bhasin, No. RIF090125) for a car loan involving a 1994 Mercedes-Benz. Just days prior to trial, defendant went to the Redlands Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV), located in San Bernardino County, and gave them false information regarding the registered owner of the Mercedes. The DMV, based on this information, generated a report of deposit of fees (RDF) that listed John Ferguson (the person whose identity defendant was charged…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. People v. ZamudioCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
  2. People v. GuerraCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
  3. People v. RundleCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
  4. People v. CoronadoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  5. In Re RojasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. MorrisonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  2. People v. Shah, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
  3. People v. LuceroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2019
  4. People v. ShahCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API