Orloff v. Pece
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtCraig, J.
From a judgment in favor of the plaintiff in a suit in unlawful detainer after sale under a deed of trust, the defendants appealed.
The deed of the trustee recited that said sale was made by him “through his attorney”. It is contended that such recital rendered the deed insufficient as prima facie evidence of title in the vendee, plaintiff and respondent. It is also contended that except through the authority- of section 2924a of the Civil Code the sale could not be conducted by the trustee through his attorney. The appellants seek to invoke the rule announced in Central Sav. Bank v. Lake, 62…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Miles v. ThorneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
- Stockwell v. BarnumCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1908
- Central Sav. Bk. of Oakland v. LakeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
3Cited by2 opinions
- Kraemer v. CowardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
- Prudential Insurance Co. of America v. SlyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936