Legal Opinion

Martin v. High Splint Coal Co.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided March 26, 1937PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Thomas

Affirm. ing.

The appellees are three corporations and one individual. The business of some of them is that of mining coal from land in which such deposits are found; and some of them are engaged in extracting oil and gas where such deposits are found. Each of the plaintiffs owns in fee the mineral which they remove, or the entire land in which it is found and in some instances the right to prosecute such business is conferred by leases owned by them, whereby they acquired the priv- • ilege to make such explorations. They filed this declaratory judgment action…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Raydure v. Board of SupervisorsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1919
  2. Deposit Bank of Owensboro v. Daveiss CountyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1897
  3. City of Lexington v. Lexington Leader Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1921
  4. Bradley v. McAteeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1870
  5. Felts, County Attorney v. Linton, County JudgeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1926

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Hibernia Nat. Bank v. Louisiana Tax CommissionSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1940
  2. Blum v. EngelmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1948
  3. Gillis v. YountKentucky Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Gray v. Methodist Episcopal Church, South, Widows & Orphans HomeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1938
  5. Burns v. ShepherdCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1954

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API