Trost v. Beck
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the CourtGardner, J.
Suit by appellant against appellee upon a promissory note. The defendant is the wife of A. W. Beck, and her defense is rested upon the theory that the note sued upon was given as security for the debt of the husband in violation of section 4497 of the Code of 1907, which provides that “the wife shall not, directly or indirectly, become the surety for the husband.”
The cause was tried before the court without a jury. Plaintiff rested his case upon the introduction of the note; and did not offer other proof or himself testify during the progress of the cause. The defendant and her husband…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Lamkin v. LovellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1912
- Elkins v. Bank of HenrySupreme Court of Alabama · 1912
- Staples v. City Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1915
- Hall v. GordonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1914
- Third Nat. Bank v. TierneyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1908
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Lester v. JacobsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1925
- Alabama Farm Bureau Credit Corporation v. HelmsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
- Hendon v. HendonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
- Clark v. Lineville Nat. BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936