Legal Opinion
Moe v. Dinkins
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided August 17, 1981No. 80 Civ. 1577 (CBM)PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
MOTLEY, District Judge.
Plaintiffs Maria Moe, Raoul Roe and Ricardo Roe seek a judgment declaring unconstitutional, and enjoining the enforcement of, the parental consent requirement of New York Domestic Relations Law §§ 15.2 and 15.3 (Section 15). Section 15.2 provides that all male applicants for a marriage license between ages 16 and 18 and all female applicants between ages 14 and 18 must obtain “written consent to the marriage from both parents of the minor or minors or such as shall then be living. ...” Section 15.3 requires that a woman between ages 14 and 16 obtain…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Griswold v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Wisconsin v. YoderSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Does I thru XXIII v. Advanced Textile Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- T.W. And M.W., Minors, by Their Next Friend, Scott Enk v. Thomas BrophyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
- Roe v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2001
- N.W. v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- Caballero v. AnselmoDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1991
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.