Legal Opinion
Sharol Martin v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)
Decided June 28, 2013No. 06-12-00187-CRPublishedCited by 85 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Opinion by
Chief Justice MORRISS.
In this case, in which Sharol Martin was prosecuted on a charge of conspiracy to manufacture between four and 200 grams of methamphetamine, she was declared indigent, and an attorney and an investigator 1 were appointed to assist in her defense. In Martin’s judgment of conviction, the trial court assessed against Martin both her attorney’s fees and the investigator’s fees; and it was recited that she was convicted under Section 481.112 of the Texas Health and Safety Code and Section 12.42 of Texas Penal Code and that the offense was a “first-degree…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Griffin v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Douglas v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Ake v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by85 opinions
- London v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2016
- Anthony v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2016
- Phelps v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2017
- Stanton Wayne Yates v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2016
- Aaron Dathan Davis v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2014
80 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.