Legal Opinion

Tudor Boiler Manufacturing Co. v. Teeken

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided January 14, 1929PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHamilton, P. J.

The defendant in error, George Teeken, recovered a judgment for personal injuries, in the court of common pleas, against the Tudor Boiler Manufacturing Company, plaintiff in error here. The hoiler company prosecutes error to that judgment.

Teeken was a baker, baking and selling products, and in his bakeshop he used an upright iron boiler, about 2 feet in diameter and about 4 feet in height. The boiler was located on a raised concrete base about 4 feet square. It appears that the boiler needed repairing, and Teeken called up the boiler company to inspect the boiler and see if it could be…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Cleveland Ry. Co. v. McCoyOhio Court of Appeals · 1927

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Eckroate v. BaudersOhio Court of Appeals · 1931
  2. Kellner v. HagoodOhio Court of Appeals · 1930
  3. MacBard Coal Co. v. BaylesOhio Court of Appeals · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API