Tudor Boiler Manufacturing Co. v. Teeken
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtHamilton, P. J.
The defendant in error, George Teeken, recovered a judgment for personal injuries, in the court of common pleas, against the Tudor Boiler Manufacturing Company, plaintiff in error here. The hoiler company prosecutes error to that judgment.
Teeken was a baker, baking and selling products, and in his bakeshop he used an upright iron boiler, about 2 feet in diameter and about 4 feet in height. The boiler was located on a raised concrete base about 4 feet square. It appears that the boiler needed repairing, and Teeken called up the boiler company to inspect the boiler and see if it could be…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Cleveland Ry. Co. v. McCoyOhio Court of Appeals · 1927
3Cited by3 opinions
- Eckroate v. BaudersOhio Court of Appeals · 1931
- Kellner v. HagoodOhio Court of Appeals · 1930
- MacBard Coal Co. v. BaylesOhio Court of Appeals · 1930