Legal Opinion

Mead v. Ph. Zang Brewing Co.

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided January 15, 1908No. 5393; No. 3046 C. APublishedCited by 8 opinions

Error to the District Court of the City and County of Denver.* Hon. Peter L. Palmer, Judge. Action by Marcus S. Mead against The Ph. Zang Brewing Company and John Hall. Prom a judg-' ment in favor of defendant company, plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

'Mr. Justice G-abbert

delivered the opinion of the court:

The only question presented for our consideration is the ruling of the court, refusing the instruction requested, and in directing the jury to return a verdict for the brewing company. The brewing company was not the lessee of the premises, and had no control thereover whatsoever. The fact that the license stood in its name would be competent to prove that it was interested in, or was conducting, the saloon, but not conclusive on that question in the face of the other undisputed testimony bearing on the subject of who was the owner of…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. City of Menard v. CoatsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933
  2. Ryan Gulch Reservoir Co. v. SwartzSupreme Court of Colorado · 1925
  3. Cardiff Light & Water Co. v. TaylorSupreme Court of Colorado · 1923
  4. Larimer & Weld Irrigation Co. v. WalkerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1918
  5. Preston v. LewisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API