Crisp v. Allied Interstate Collection Agency
District Court, M.D. North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM ORDER
THOMAS D. SCHROEDER, District Judge.
Using what is facially apparent to be a boilerplate complaint from a wholly different legal action in Ohio, Plaintiff Luster James Crisp brings claims under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (“FDCPA”), 15 U.S.C. §§ 1692 et seq.- Before the court are motions for judgment on the pleadings by Defendants Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC (“Portfolio”) (Doc. 32), Collecto, Inc. (“Collecto”). (Doc. 25), and Online Information Services (“Online”) (Doc. 37). Crisp has filed responses to Collecto’s and Online’s motions (Docs.30, 42). but has…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Giarratano v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2008
- Shawn Massey v. J.J. OjaniitCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2014
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Antwain Porter v. Yates, in his official and individual capacitiesDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2025
- Gordon v. EtheridgeUnited States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2019
- In Re: Port City Contracting Services, Inc.District Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2025
- Port City Contracting Services, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2025