Legal Opinion

White v. White

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided December 5, 1880PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtStanley, J.

An order of court authorizing the attachment was not necessary (Laws of 1879, c. 57, s. 28); and there is no occasion to inquire whether there were any defects of notice or entry. If objections to such defects were not waived by the defendant’s general appearance (Colby v. Knapp, 13 N. H. 175; Wright v. Boynton, 87 N. H. 9, 19; March v. Eastern R. R., 40 N. H. 548, 583), they were waived by bis appearance and motion for a continuance. His motion to dismiss, although made within the first four days of the first term (Seaver v. Allen, 48 N. H. 473), was not seasonably made after his motion for…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Candia v. ChandlerSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1877

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Dolber v. YoungSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API