Legal Opinion
Megenity v. Stenger
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided June 23, 1994No. 93-5564PublishedCited by 40 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGuy, Circuit Judge, joined by Milburn, Circuit Judge,
BROWN, Senior Circuit Judge (p. 1125), delivered a separate opinion concurring in the result.
RALPH B. GUY, Jr., Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff, Mark Megenity, appeals from a summary judgment granted in favor of defendants. Megenity had administratively appealed his dismissal for academic reasons from the University of Louisville School of Law. When his appeal was denied, Megenity filed this 42 U.S.C. § 1988 action claiming he had been denied substantive and procedural due process. Defendants’ motion for summary judgment that followed was predicated on a theory of qualified immunity.
Defendants’…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Perry v. SindermannSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Bishop v. WoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Goss v. LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Patricia Scott v. Clay County, Tennessee Chinn Anderson Billy Pierce Michael ThompsonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
- Robert Painter v. Bill Robertson Robert TushCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
- Robert P. Brennan v. Township of Northville, Lawrence Demeter and Fred Yankee, Individually and in Their Official CapacitiesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
- Buchanan v. City of BolivarCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
- Goldstein v. MoatzCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2004
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.