Legal Opinion

Kelso v. City of Tacoma

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 5, 1964No. 36625Published

1Opinion of the Court

63 Wn.2d 913 (1964)

390 P.2d 2

DAVID C. KELSO et al., Appellants,

v.

CITY OF TACOMA, Respondent.[*]

No. 36625

The Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.

March 5, 1964.

Sterbick, Manza, Moceri & Sterbick, by Michael S. Manza, for appellants.

Brethorst, Fowler, Bateman, Reed & McClure, for respondent.

John P. Tracy, Jr., Howard A. Anderson, Theodore R. Fournier, and LeRoy C. Kinnie, amici curiae.

HUNTER, J.

The plaintiff (appellant), Wilhelmina S. Kelso, was injured in an automobile collision with a vehicle owned by the defendant (respondent), City of Tacoma, on August 30, 1961. At the time of the accident…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Holytz v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Hill v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1877
  3. Bernardine v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1945
  4. Sutton v. City of SnohomishWashington Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Kelso v. City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1964

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API