Legal Opinion

Rocky Mountain Wild v. Walsh

District Court, D. Colorado

Decided October 25, 2016No. Civil Action No. 15-cv-0615-WJMPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER VACATING ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION AND REQUIRING MEET-AND-CONFER BETWEEN THE PARTIES

William J. Martinez, United States District Judge

In this lawsuit, various conservation organizations (“Plaintiffs”) challenge a decision by the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (“FWS”) not to list two flowers as threatened or endangered under the Endangered Species Act (“ESA”), 16 U.S.C. §§ 1531 et seq. (ECF No. 1.) Those flowers are the Graham’s beardtongue (Penstemon grahamii) and White River *1238beardtongue (P. scariosus var. albifluvis) (together, “beardtongues"). These beard-tongues are endemic to…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. New Mexico Ex Rel. Richardson v. Bureau of Land ManagementCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
  4. American Petroleum Institute v. Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1976
  5. Barnes v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2015

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Survivors v. U.S. Dep't of the InteriorDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2018
  2. Center for Biological Diversity v. HaalandDistrict Court, D. Montana · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API