Legal Opinion

Ashley Davis v. Frank Bisignano

District Court, S.D. Georgia

Decided April 16, 2026No. 6:25-cv-00011Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA STATESBORO DIVISION ASHLEY DAVIS, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) CV625-011 ) FRANK BISIGNANO, ) ) Defendant. ) REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Plaintiff Ashley Davis seeks attorney’s fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act. Doc. 23. The Defendant does not oppose the motion. Id. at 1. For the reasons set forth below, it is RECOMMENDED1 that Plaintiff’s motion be GRANTED. Doc. 23. I. BACKGROUND After considering the parties’ briefs in this social security appeal, the Court reversed the Commissioner’s final decision and remanded this case to the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Astrue v. RatliffSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  2. Shalala v. SchaeferSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Mattie Norman, Clara Marshall, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. The Housing Authority of the City of MontgomeryCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1988
  4. Marie Lucie Jean v. Alan C. NelsonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1988
  5. Jackson v. Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2010

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API