P.I.E., LLC v. DeSoto County
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
ALTENBERND, Judge.
P.I.E., LLC, appeals an order that dismissed its amended complaint with prejudice. We affirm the dismissal as to count II of the amended complaint but reverse the dismissal as to count I. Count I alleged a claim under the Bert J. Harris, Jr., Private Property Rights Protection Act. See § 70.001, Fla. Stat. (2007) (the “Bert Harris Act”). The trial court granted De-Soto County’s motion to dismiss this count, reasoning that the claim was untimely under the one-year period contained in subsection 70.001(11). That subsection states: “A cause of action may not be commenced under…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Wendler v. City of St. AugustineDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013
- Turkali v. City of Safety HarborDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012
3Cited by2 opinions
- Onika Williams v. The City of Jacksonville (County of Duval)District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016
- Hussey v. Collier CountyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014