Legal Opinion
Good v. Curtis
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided March 23, 2010No. 09-10341PublishedCited by 57 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HAYNES, Circuit Judge:
Appellant’s Motion for Panel Rehearing is DENIED. This opinion is substituted in place of the prior opinion, Good v. Curtis, 2010 WL 550520 (5th Cir. Feb. 18, 2010).
Appellee Donald Wayne Good brought suit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against Appellant Fred Curtis, alleging that Curtis violated Good’s rights under the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments when he manipulated a photographic lineup in an effort to procure a false identification from the victim in a rape case. Curtis takes this interlocutory appeal from the district court’s denial of his motion for summary judgment on…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Mitchell v. ForsythSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Malley v. BriggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Neil v. BiggersSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Wallace v. KatoSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by57 opinions
- Armstrong v. AshleyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2023
- Kovacic v. VillarrealCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2010
- Tom Heaney v. Christopher RobertsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2017
- Thomas v. City of Galveston, TexasDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2011
- Roque v. HarvelCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2021
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.