Ingram v. Coca-Cola Enterprises, Inc.
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Per curiam
The petitioner, Annette Ingram [“Ingram”], seeks mandamus relief to review an order of the circuit court granting the respondent, Coca-Cola Enterprises, Inc.’s [“Coca-Cola”], motion to recuse the trial judge. Ingram contends that Coca-Cola’s motion for recusal was untimely and legally insufficient.
Mandamus will lie to correct a recusal based upon a mistaken decision that the recusal affidavit was legally sufficient and timely filed. See May Invs., Inc. v. Lisa S.A., 814 So.2d 471 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002); Dade County v. Turnbull, 572 So.2d 540 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990); see also State ex rel. Rembrandt…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Rembrandt Corp. v. ThomasSupreme Court of Florida · 1934
- Dade County v. TurnbullDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
- May Investments, Inc. v. LISA, SADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002
3Cited by1 opinion
- Brown v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004