Legal Opinion

Ingram v. Coca-Cola Enterprises, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided August 16, 2002No. 5D02-1043PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

The petitioner, Annette Ingram [“Ingram”], seeks mandamus relief to review an order of the circuit court granting the respondent, Coca-Cola Enterprises, Inc.’s [“Coca-Cola”], motion to recuse the trial judge. Ingram contends that Coca-Cola’s motion for recusal was untimely and legally insufficient.

Mandamus will lie to correct a recusal based upon a mistaken decision that the recusal affidavit was legally sufficient and timely filed. See May Invs., Inc. v. Lisa S.A., 814 So.2d 471 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002); Dade County v. Turnbull, 572 So.2d 540 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990); see also State ex rel. Rembrandt…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Rembrandt Corp. v. ThomasSupreme Court of Florida · 1934
  2. Dade County v. TurnbullDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
  3. May Investments, Inc. v. LISA, SADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Brown v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API