Legal Opinion

Lorenc v. Call

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided March 6, 1990No. 890286-CAPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BILLINGS, Judge:

Plaintiff appeals an adverse judgment denying her claims that defendants’ former fee waiver policy and procedures violated state law, hoard of education rules, and the due process clause of the fourteenth amendment of the United States Constitution and article I, section 7 of the Utah Constitution. We reverse and remand.

We note that this opinion is issued in place of our prior opinion in this case, Lorenc v. Call, 124 Utah Adv.Rep. 37 (Ct.App.1989), which was vacated on March 6, 1990. As a result of a petition for rehearing in this case, we have concluded that our previous…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Bell v. HoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Gomez v. ToledoSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Maher v. GagneSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Smith v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Scharf v. BMG Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 1985

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Call v. City of West JordanCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1990
  2. Fussell v. Department of Commerce, Division of Occupational & Professional LicensingCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1991
  3. Prince v. Tooele County Housing AuthorityCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1992
  4. Call v. City of West JordanCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1990
  5. Harper v. Summit CountyCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1998

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API