Callarama v. Associates Discount Corp. of Delaware, Inc.
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtEmmett J. Schnepp, J.
The defendant moved to dismiss the first two causes of action in the complaint on the grounds that they are legally insufficient and to dismiss the entire complaint because the causes of action are barred by the Statute of Limitations.
In this case, still in the pleading stage, the plaintiff Alphonse F. Callarama, in his first cause of action seeks compensatory and punitive damages for emotional distress and personal injuries suffered from11 unjustified damaging, threatening, harassing and malicious telephone calls and statements ” made by defendant to plaintiffs and various relatives and from…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Gill v. Montgomery Ward & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1954
- Mitran v. WilliamsonNew York Supreme Court · 1960
- Caso v. GotbaumNew York Supreme Court · 1971
3Cited by8 opinions
- Ronald E. Galella v. Jacqueline Onassis, John Walsh, and United States of America, Intervenor-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
- Au v. AuHawaii Supreme Court · 1981
- Leah B. Sibley v. Fulton Dekalb Collection ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1982
- Nestlerode v. Federal InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
- Clark v. New York Telephone Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.