Legal Opinion

Dominique v. Washington Nat. Life Ins. Co.

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided March 9, 1936No. 16080Published

1Opinion

On Petition for Rehearing.

2Per curiam

In the petition and brief for a rehearing in this matter, our attention has been called to .the fact that this court, in the case of Figgins v. Life & Casualty Ins. Co. of Tenn., 151 So. 129, held that the contract of insurance is indivisible regardless of how the premium was allocated. That decision may be distinguished from the case at bar upon the ground that in the Figgins Case the question involved related to whether or not a contract of insurance ever came into being because of the lack of concurrence, or meeting of the minds between the parties to the…

3Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Penn Mutual Life Insurance v. HartleCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1933
  2. New York Life Ins. Co. v. DavisDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1933
  3. Rosso v. New York Life Ins. Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Pyramid Life Ins. Co. v. SelkirkCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1936
  5. Figgins v. Life Casualty Ins. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API