Legal Opinion

Kurtzman v. Hankin

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 9, 1998PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OLSZEWSKI, Judge:

This is an appeal of an order denying appellant Philadelphia Newspapers, Inc.’s (PNI) petition to intervene and to obtain access to judicial records and proceedings. We reverse.

The underlying action originated through writ of summons by plaintiffs Sabina Hankin Kurtzman and Gertrude Hankin. Gertrude Hankin later withdrew from this action. A deposition of Michael Hepps, Esq., was taken in preparation of the subsequent complaint. The complaint charged defendants/appellees with causing plaintiffs emotional distress and legal fees by filing baseless claims in a Montgomery County…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. BuehlSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. Stenger v. Lehigh Valley Hospital CenterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  3. Watson v. City of PhiladelphiaCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  4. Hutchison v. LuddySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  5. Commonwealth v. FrattarolaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Gormley v. EdgarSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
  2. PA ChildCare LLC v. FloodSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API