Fugate v. Jackson Hewitt, Inc.
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Dissent
CYNTHIA L. MARTIN, Presiding Judge.
I respectfully dissent from the majority opinion’s conclusion that Jackson Hewitt is a “credit services organization” subject to the provisions of sections 407.635 to 407.644. I would affirm the trial court’s dismissal of Fugate’s petition.
I agree with the majority opinion’s observation that in interpreting the credit services organization statutes to determine their applicability to Jackson Hewitt, we must “ ‘ascertain the intent of the legislature from the language used, [ ] give effect to that intent if possible, and [ ] consider the words in their plain…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- South Metropolitan Fire Protection District v. City of Lee's SummitSupreme Court of Missouri · 2009
- Martinez v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2000
- State Ex Rel. Wright v. CarterSupreme Court of Missouri · 1958
- State Ex Rel. Dravo Corporation v. SpradlingSupreme Court of Missouri · 1974
- Bosworth v. SewellSupreme Court of Missouri · 1996
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.