Legal Opinion

Timken Roller Bearing v. Pennsylvania Railroad

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided October 18, 1926No. Nos. 168, 178Published

1Opinion of the Court

273 U.S. 665

47 S.Ct. 454

71 L.Ed. 829

TIMKEN ROLLER BEARING COMPANY, plaintiff in error,

v.

The PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD COMPANY,* and Thomas P. GOODBODY, as Receiver of the Hydraulic Steel Company, plaintiff in error, v. The PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD COMPANY.

Nos. 168, 178.

Supreme Court of the United States

February 28, 1927

Messrs. Luther Day and Rufus S. Day, both of Cleveland, Ohio (Donald W. Kling, of Cleveland, Ohio, of counsel), for plaintiff in error.

Messrs. Andrew Squire, Thomas M. Kirby and Andrew P. Martin, all of Cleveland, Ohio, for defendant in error.

2Per curiam

1

Dismissed for lack of jurisdiction in…

3Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Oliver American Trading Co. v. Government of United States of MexicoSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  2. Timken Roller Bearing Co. v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  3. Transportes Maritimos Do Estado v. AlmeidaSupreme Court of the United States · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API