Legal Opinion

Unnerstall v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided August 21, 2001No. ED 78208PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MOONEY, Judge.

Movant, Bernard Unnerstall, appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. Movant alleges error in the motion’s denial, but because the motion was untimely filed, we vacate the judgment of the motion court and remand for dismissal of Movant’s Rule 24.035 motion.

Movant was delivered to the Department of Corrections on April 9, 1999. He filed a pro se Rule 24.035 motion, which he signed and had notarized on June 26, 1999. In his brief, Movant asserts the motion was filed in Franklin County Circuit Court on July 7,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Day v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1989
  2. Euge v. GoldenMissouri Court of Appeals · 1977
  3. Reynolds v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1996
  4. O'ROURKE v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990
  5. Hall v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1999

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. BrockMissouri Court of Appeals · 2003
  2. Molder v. TRAMMELL CROW SERVICES, INC.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2010
  3. Phelps v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2011
  4. White v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2002
  5. Casey Langhans v. State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2016

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API