Reynolds v. State

LAURA DENVIR STITH, Judge.

Defendant Earl Reynolds’ Rule 24.035 and Rule 29.07(d) motions for post-conviction re lief were dismissed by the motion court because they were not brought within the time limits set by Rule 24.035. 1 He appeals the dismissals, alleging that (1) the time limit for Rule 24.035 motions should not apply here because the facts underlying the motion were not known to him until after the time period for filing his motion had passed, and (2) his Rule 29.07(d) motion is not governed by the ninety-day time limit set out in Rule 24.035 because his claim is not cognizable under…