Legal Opinion

American Family Life Assurance Co. v. Federal Communications Commission

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided November 21, 1997No. 96-1384PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RANDOLPH, Circuit Judge:. In 1996 the Federal Communications Commission ruled that AFLAC Broadcast Partners, then the licensee of six commercial television stations and the owner-operator of a seventh, violated the Communications Act by refusing to sell time to candidates for federal elective office who refused to agree to a forum selection clause contained in AF-LAC’s standard “Agreement Form for Political Broadcasts.” After the Commission’s decision, but before the case reached us, AF-LAC sold all of its interests in the television stations and apparently dissolved, with petitioner assuming…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. City of Los Angeles v. LyonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Montana v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Chamber of Commerce v. Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2011
  2. Pharmachemie B.V. v. Barr Laboratories, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2002
  3. Loughlin, Thomas P. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2004
  4. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. v. SebeliusCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2010
  5. 21st Century Telesis Joint Venture and 21st Century Bidding Corporation v. Federal Communications Commission, Salmon Pcs, Llc, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2003

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API