Legal Opinion

Caroline State Bank v. Radtke

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided November 7, 1933PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFairchild, J.

By the agreement in this case the signers agreed jointly and severally to guarantee the payment to respondent of all notes, drafts, and acceptances executed or indorsed by the Lily Lumber Company, Inc., “which may be owned or which may hereafter be acquired . . . or so executed or indorsed by the Lily Lumber Company,” and made a sufficient guaranty effective to fix liability upon the guarantors including notes executed by the company after the date of the, guaranty. The words “so executed and indorsed,” in order to have any meaning, must be read in connection with the words “hereafter be…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Caroline State Bank v. AndrewsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Mitchell Street State Bank v. FroedtertWisconsin Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Bradley Bank v. PrideWisconsin Supreme Court · 1932

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Schuyler State Bank v. CechNebraska Supreme Court · 1988
  2. State Ex Rel. Hartwig's Poultry Farm, Inc. v. BundeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API