Legal Opinion

State v. Strange

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided May 18, 1982No. 8127SC1069PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MARTIN (Harry C.), Judge.

The decisive question on this appeal is whether the trial court erred in denying the defendant’s motion to dismiss at the close of all the evidence. Such a motion requires the court to consider all the evidence in the light most favorable to the state. State v. McKinney, 288 N.C. 113, 215 S.E. 2d 578 (1975). In this case the state relies in part upon circumstantial evidence. If, however, there is substantial evidence to support a finding that the offense charged has been committed and that defendant committed it, the motion to dismiss should be denied whether the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. StephensSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  2. State v. IrickSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
  3. State v. McKinneySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  4. State v. FosterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
  5. State v. MillerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. BerryCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API