Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Holland

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 28, 1997No. 1951631PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mitchell and Tammy Holland petition for a writ of mandamus directing Mobile Circuit Judges Braxton L. Kittrell, Jr., and Robert L. Byrd, Jr., to vacate their orders of June 12, 1996, and June 14, 1996, respectively. Those orders, together, had the effect of precluding the Hollands from opting out of a class action filed in the Mobile County Circuit Court by Jacqueline Anderson against Fidelity Financial Services, Inc. ("Fidelity"), and Auto Mart of the Southeast, Inc. ("Auto Mart"), and, thereby, preventing the Hollands from individually pursuing their claims for punitive damages against…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. BMW of North America, Inc. v. GoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  3. Phillips Petroleum Co. v. ShuttsSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. In Re "Agent Orange" Product Liability Litigation Mdl No. 381Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
  5. Green Oil Co. v. HornsbySupreme Court of Alabama · 1989

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Leonard v. Terminix Intern. Co., LPSupreme Court of Alabama · 2003
  2. Ex Parte Household Retail Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1999
  3. Ex Parte State Mutual Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1997
  4. Ex Parte AmSouth BancorporationSupreme Court of Alabama · 1998
  5. Ex Parte Government Employees Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1999

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API