Legal Opinion

Boldt v. First National Bank

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided November 23, 1899No. 9,038PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Error from the district court of Cuming county. Tried below before Evans, J.

1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, C. J.

In the petition filed in this suit it was alleged that the bank recovered a judgment for a stated amount in the district court of Cuming county against Gust Will and Wilhelm Boldt, which remained of full force and unsatisfied; that execution for the enforcement of the judgment had been procured to issue, and had been returned by the sheriff of said county wholly unsatisfied; that the parties judgment debtors had no property liable to execution, and were insolvent; that on December 30, 1889, Wilhelm Boldt and Johanna Boldt, his wife, conveyed to their son Rudolph Boldt, who was then a minor, a…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Board of Trustees of York College v. CheneyNebraska Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Enos v. HanffNebraska Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Hale v. GardinerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  4. First National Bank of Sutton v. Sutton Mercantile Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1906
  5. McMillan v. Chadron State BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1927

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API