Legal Opinion
Maine AFL-CIO v. Superintendent of Insurance
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Decided December 4, 1998PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDana, J.
[¶ 1] The Maine AFL-CIO appeals from a judgment entered in the Superior Court (Penobscot County, Alexander, J.) dismissing for lack of ripeness its appeal challenging a rule promulgated by the Bureau of Insurance (Bureau) governing “pilot projects” for workers’ compensation insurance pursuant to 39-A M.R.S.A. § 403 (Supp.1998). We affirm the judgment of the Superior Court.
[¶ 2] Maine employers have three options in providing workers’ compensation coverage for employees. 1 An employer may purchase workers’ compensation insurance, § 403(1); establish an authorized self-insurance program, §…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- New England Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1982
- Wagner v. Secretary of StateSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1995
- Lewiston, Greene & Monmouth Telephone Co. v. New England Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1973
- Wheeler v. Maine Unemployment Insurance CommissionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1984
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Johnson v. City of AugustaSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2006
- Johnson v. CraneSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2017
- Darling's v. Nissan North America, Inc.District Court, D. Maine · 2000
- Basic Research, LLC v. Federal Trade CommissionDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2011
- Matthews v. MatthewsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2008
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.