Legal Opinion

Woodford v. Kelley

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided December 21, 1904PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Appeal from circuit court, Beadle county; Hon. J. H. McCoy, Judge. Action by George O. Woodford and another against C. A. Kelley. From a judgment in fayor of plaintiffs, defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtHaney, J.

The plaintiffs allege in their complaint,- in substance, that on August 10, 1901, the parties entered into a contract whereby they became jointly interested in the cutting, baling and shipping of hay; that by the terms of such contract defendant was to furnish certain hay lands, and plaintiffs were to cut, stack, and load the hay on cars, at stations named therein, at their own expense, and, when so loaded, were to receive for their labor and outlay $4 per ton; that plaintiffs, under defendant’s directions and pursuant to such contract, did cut and stack 425 tons of hay; that they baled about…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Johnson v. BurnsideSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Wright v. ShermanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Sherwood v. City of Sioux FallsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Townsend v. KennedySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Hulst v. Benevolent Hall Ass'nSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1896

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Miller v. ScholtenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Ahlers Building Supply, Inc. v. LarsenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Van Den Hoek v. BradwischSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Burgi v. RudgersSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1906
  5. Burner v. Northwestern Bible & Missionary Training SchoolSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API