Legal Opinion
Ex Parte Howell
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided April 4, 1986No. 83-776PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, PETITION TO DECLARE UNCONSTITUTIONAL DISCIPLINARY RULES 2-102 (A)(7)* AND 2-106 (a)(1)* OF THE ALABAMA CODE OF PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, PETITION FOR THE COURT TO AMEND DISCIPLINARY RULES 2-102 (A)(7) AND 2-106 (A)(1) OF THE ALABAMA CODE OF PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY
* Disciplinary Rules 2-102 and 2-106 were rescinded effective October 25, 1985, and were, in effect, replaced by provisions in Temporary DR 2-101 through Temporary DR 2-106 adopted effective that date.
Allen Howell, a Montgomery lawyer, seeks a writ of…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Bates v. State Bar of ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Ohralik v. Ohio State Bar Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Bates v. State Bar of ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- In re R. M. J.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Peel v. Attorney Registration & Disciplinary Commission of IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Norris v. TurnerDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 1986
- Peel v. Attorney Registration & Disciplinary Commission of IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1990