Peel v. Attorney Registration & Disciplinary Commission of Illinois
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the Court
496 U.S. 91 (1990)
PEEL
v.
ATTORNEY REGISTRATION AND DISCIPLINARY COMMISSION OF ILLINOIS
No. 88-1775.
Supreme Court of United States.
Argued January 17, 1990
Decided June 4, 1990
CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF ILLINOIS
Bruce J. Ennis, Jr., argued the cause and filed briefs for petitioner.
Stephen J. Marzen argued the cause for the Federal Trade Commission as amicus curiae urging reversal. With him on the brief were Solicitor General Starr, Assistant Attorney General Rill, Deputy Solicitor General Merrill, Kevin J. Arquit, Jay C. Shaffer, and Ernest J. Isenstadt.
William F. Moran III argued the cause…
Also in this document: Judgment of the Court; Concurring in the judgment; Dissent · White; Dissent · O'Connor.
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Cantwell v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Virginia State Board of Pharmacy v. Virginia Citizens Consumer Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Bose Corp. v. Consumers Union of United States, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Near v. Minnesota Ex Rel. OlsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.