Legal Opinion

Knight v. Dakota 2000 Inc.

District Court, D. South Dakota

Decided October 28, 2022No. 3:21-cv-03025Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH DAKOTA CENTRAL DIVISION AUSTON KNIGHT, INDIVIDUALLY AND 3:21-CV-03025-RAL ON BEHALF OF ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED; Plaintiff, OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART MOTION TO CONDITIONALLY CERTIFY FLSA COLLECTIVE ACTION VS. DAKOTA 2000 INC., Defendant. The Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) permits employees to bring their FLSA claims through a collective action on behalf of themselves and other “similarly situated” employees. 29 U.S.C. § 216(b). Employees wishing to participate in the collective action must opt in by filing written consent with the…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Hoffmann-La Roche Inc. v. SperlingSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. Comcast Corp. v. BehrendSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  3. Myers v. Hertz Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
  4. Daniel Campbell v. City of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
  5. Swales v. KLLM Transport ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2021

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API