Legal Opinion

Day & Zimmermann, Inc. v. Blocked Iron Corp. of America

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County

Decided August 6, 1958No. 156PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Waters, J.,

An appeal having been taken in the above-captioned matter, this opinion is filed in accordance with the mandate set forth in Supreme Court rule 43.

On October 11, 1957, plaintiff filed a mechanic’s lien against the interest of defendant as lessee of land occupied by defendant’s plant for the production of blocked iron. The lien purported to cover the plant as well as the land. Notice of the filing of the lien was given on October 14, 1957, by plaintiff to H. Francis DeLone, Esq., as attorney for defendant, and that notice was formally accepted by defendant’s counsel by letter dated…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Samango v. HobbsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
  2. O'Kane v. MurraySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1916
  3. Hannah & Lay Mercantile Co. v. MosserMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Ryan v. KellyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1880
  5. Street Lumber Co. v. SullivanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Day & Zimmermann, Inc. v. Blocked Iron Corp. of AmericaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API