Legal Opinion

Cheryl & Co. v. Krueger

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided April 28, 2021No. 2:18-cv-01485Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION CHERYL & CO., Plaintiff, Case No. 2:18-cv-1485 JUDGE EDMUND A. SARGUS, JR. v. Magistrate Judge Kimberly A. Jolson CHERYL L. KRUEGER, et al., Defendants. OPINION AND ORDER This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff Cheryl & Co.’s Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 122) and Defendants Cheryl L. Krueger, CKE Management, LLC, David Adell, and Amy Coley-Tonti’s Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 123). For the following reasons, the Court GRANTS in part, DENIES in part, and DENIES AS MOOT in part both motions. I.…

2Cases cited45 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Nassau Trust Co. v. Montrose Concrete Products Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1982

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API