United States v. Juan Ledezma-Rodriguez, Also Known as Roberto Hurtado Madrigal-Guzman
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
GRUENDER, Circuit Judge.
Juan Ledezma-Rodriguez (“Ledezma”) filed a motion to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255, arguing that one of his attorneys provided ineffective assistance by filing a motion to withdraw guilty pleas against his wishes and that two of his attorneys provided ineffective assistance by failing to explain his obligations under a plea agreement and to facilitate his desire to cooperate with law enforcement. The district court 1 denied Ledezma’s § 2255 motion without an evidentiary hearing. Ledezma appeals the district court’s decision not to…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Blackledge v. AllisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Corey Earl Engelen v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
- United States v. Michael Leroy Barnes, and Cheryl BarnesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
- David Paul Voytik v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by51 opinions
- Anjulo-Lopez v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
- Terrick Alfred Williams v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2006
- New v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011
- United States v. MiellDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 2010
- United States v. ArcorenDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2009
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.