Legal Opinion

United States v. Juan Ledezma-Rodriguez, Also Known as Roberto Hurtado Madrigal-Guzman

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided September 13, 2005No. 04-2632PublishedCited by 51 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GRUENDER, Circuit Judge.

Juan Ledezma-Rodriguez (“Ledezma”) filed a motion to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255, arguing that one of his attorneys provided ineffective assistance by filing a motion to withdraw guilty pleas against his wishes and that two of his attorneys provided ineffective assistance by failing to explain his obligations under a plea agreement and to facilitate his desire to cooperate with law enforcement. The district court 1 denied Ledezma’s § 2255 motion without an evidentiary hearing. Ledezma appeals the district court’s decision not to…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Blackledge v. AllisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Corey Earl Engelen v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
  4. United States v. Michael Leroy Barnes, and Cheryl BarnesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
  5. David Paul Voytik v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. Anjulo-Lopez v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
  2. Terrick Alfred Williams v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2006
  3. New v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011
  4. United States v. MiellDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 2010
  5. United States v. ArcorenDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2009

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API