Oberly v. Oberly
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 67, Jan. T., 1899, by defendant, from order of C. P. Berks Co., March T., 1898, No. 149, discharging rule to open judgment. Rule to open judgment.
Read the full summary
Appeal, No. 67, Jan. T., 1899, by defendant, from order of C. P. Berks Co., March T., 1898, No. 149, discharging rule to open judgment. Rule to open judgment. The court discharged the rale filing the following opinion: Mrs. Kate Oberly, a married woman, defendant, on March 29, 1898, duly executed and delivered to her daughter, Ida E. Oberly, now Ida E. Witman, then unmarried, a judgment bond for the sum of $1,066. Said bond contained the usual confession of judgment clause, and was entered in the prothonotary’s office of Berks county the day following its execution and delivery. The bond…
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam,
We are satisfied, from our examination of the evidence in this case, that it is wholly insufficient to sustain the rule to show cause why the judgment should not be opened and the defendant lot into a defense. The learned court was therefore clearly right in discharging the rule.
Decree affirmed and appeal dismissed at appellant’s costs.
2Cited by6 opinions
- Kolf v. LiebermanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
- Fidelity Title & Trust Co. v. GrahamSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918
- Guernsey v. FroudeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1900
- McIntosh v. CondronSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1902
- Haynes v. HarrimanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1903
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.