John P. NOREUIL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. PEABODY COAL COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
KANNE, Circuit Judge.
When John Noreuil sought to return to work at Peabody Coal Company after a long recovery period from a work-related injury, he was informed that his position had been eliminated, and thus he was forced to retire. Soon thereafter, he filed an administrative charge alleging that his forced retirement had been retaliation for an earlier, unrelated age discrimination claim that he had filed against Peabody. When this charge was denied, Noreuil filed a civil action in district court, claiming that the forced retirement had, in fact, been age discrimination. Finding that…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Griggs v. Duke Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Watson v. Fort Worth Bank & TrustSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Wards Cove Packing Co. v. AtonioSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Patricia Babrocky v. Jewel Food Company and Retail Meatcutters Union, Local 320, DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
- Arthur S. ANDERSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BAXTER HEALTHCARE CORP., Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Aberman v. Board of EducationDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2017
- Mary Heuer v. Weil-Mclain, a Division of the Marley CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
- Anderson v. Centers for New Horizons, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2012
- Flores v. Board of Trustees of Community College District No. 508District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2015
- Weatherly v. ILLINOIS HUMAN RIGHTS COM'NAppellate Court of Illinois · 2003
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.