Utah Banking Co. v. Newman
Utah Supreme Court
Appeal from District Court, Fourth District; Mon. A. B. Morgan, Judge. Action by Utah Banking Company against F. W. Newman. Judgment for defendant. Plaintiff appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtFrick, J.
This action was commenced by tbe plaintiff, appellant here, as indorsee of the promissory note sued on. In the complaint it was, in substance, alleged that appellant is a corporation, and that on the 1st day of November, 1909, the defendant, F. W. Newman respondent in this court, made and delivered to the “Baldwin Company,” a corporation, his promissory note for the sum of $250, payable to the order of said company as follows: $125 on November 1, 1909 and $125 on January 1, 1910, with ten per cent, interest after maturity; that the sum of $125 was duly paid; that, before the maturity of said…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Jackson Paper Manufacturing Co. v. Commercial National BankIllinois Supreme Court · 1902
- McCornick v. SwemUtah Supreme Court · 1909
- Davis v. Rockingham Investment Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1892
- Englehart v. Peoria Plow Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1887
3Cited by3 opinions
- Midland Savings & Loan Co. v. Tradesmen's Nat. Bank of Oklahoma CityCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1932
- Utah Banking Co. v. OlerUtah Supreme Court · 1916
- Midland Savings & Loan Co. v. Tradesmen's Nat. Bank of Oklahoma CityCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1932